A follow up on the purported overseas ballots in the Arizona vote totals
Here's the video from the November 2020 hearing.
The key point here is that no, actually, there were NOT two people present when each ballot was “duplicated”. The claim in pretty much all of these instances of manual “duplication” or “adjudication” in multiple states where fraud was obvious is that there is a democrat and a Republican looking at every ballot such that nobody can cheat and do a false “duplication” or a false “adjudication” where they change the vote. This is just one instance of an eyewitness confirming that that claim is false. There were many, many, many occasions where only a democrat was present and thus could change votes with no one to stop them.
Of course this is another issue where if you have any common sense you only have to ponder the practice for a short time before you say WTF???!!! Why is it ever okay to have someone other than the voter determining who they intended to vote for???!!! That just opens up more opportunities for fraud.
No ballot should ever be hand “duplicated” and no ballot should ever be “adjudicated”. “Adjudication” is the process of looking at ballot images on a computer screen and determining who the voter chose. Ballots go to adjudication when the ballot scanner cannot determine which candidate was chosen. And the ballot scanners have calibration settings that can be changed such the many more ballots will be rejected as unreadable, so they are forced into “adjudication” where the person doing the “adjudicating” gets to decide who gets the vote. There are at least a couple videos out there showing just how easy it is to change votes once they are in “adjudication”.
If you don’t have mail in ballots, and at the polling place you have iron clad confirmation that the machine was able to read the ballot, these two fraud opportunities are removed completely. The cost of running your election is also much lower as well since you’ll need far fewer people. And of course the more people you need, the more people you have to background check, train, and oversee to make sure they aren’t changing votes, whether intentionally or due to mistakes.
An even better solution, and a topic for a future post of it’s own, is to have every vote uniquely identified and tied to a specific voter. The unique identifier would be encrypted such that you still have roughly as much of a secret ballot as you do now at the polling place, and more secrecy than when you mail in a ballot. With any mail in ballot your name is on an outer envelope, so one or more people at the local election departments have a way to see how you voted anyway. And if you are fully aware of the extent of fraud, and you consider that the majority of voters already register as democrat or Republican, you should start to realize that the secret ballot idea is not worth a fraudulent presidency.
With unique IDs, the voter gets a printout at the polling place after he or she finishes voting. The voter must then review the printout to confirm that the machine registered his/her ballot choices properly, and the voter is then required to keep that printout in a secure manner such that it can be used in audits later on. Using an encrypted barcode on the printout, the voter and/or auditors will have the ability confirm the voter’s choices in a central database of all votes. Include government issued photo ID and a full right hand scan, and you end up with a system that can eliminate 99.99% of all fraud.