Here's what happens when the 2020 election fraud is actually investigated.
The degree of criminality and the monumental efforts to cover it up are off the charts.
In Wisconsin one of the former Wisconsin Supreme Court justices was tasked by the Wisconsin legislature, as a special counsel, with investigating what went on in the 2020 election. As you read this article, and hopefully the article I linked here, and if you take the time to read the full report, consider how completely moronic and false Bill Barr’s recent comments are. He turned out to be just another lying establishment RINO dirtbag.
Per the U.S. Constitution, it is the state legislatures that have the authority of making the rules for elections in each state. Look it up if you doubt it. In the absence of credible charges of criminal behavior or unconstitutional behavior on the part of the legislature, judges thus should have zero say in how elections are run. But of course we have hundreds if not thousands of leftist judges in this country who literally don’t give a shit about the constitution, so they intervene whenever they can to work on behalf of democrats. In my world they would be charged with felonies for doing so and removed from office immediately, as would anyone making false and frivolous claims against election auditors and investigators be charged with felonies, but I digress.
A pdf of the second interim report from the former WI supreme court justice is here, and the report refers to his office as OSC (Office of the Special Counsel). Emerald Robinson, a former Newsmax reporter, has an excellent writeup on the report here. But as good as it is, in the interest of brevity Robinson’s writeup does not even touch on all the items shown just in the report’s very descriptive table of contents, which lists multiple civil and/or criminal violations of Wisconsin law:
Table of Contents
Introduction
Statement of Progress
Chapter 1: The Center for Tech and Civic Life’s $8,800,000 Zuckerberg Plan Grant with the Cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha and Green Bay (the Zuckerberg 5 Cities) Facially Violates Wisconsin Law Prohibiting Election Bribery.
Chapter 2: The Motive for These Grants Was Impermissible and Partisan Get Out the Vote Efforts (GOTV).
Chapter 3: Government Oversight Has Been Obstructed by Governmental and Outside Corporate Collusion.
Chapter 4: This Collusion and Entanglement Also Caused a Host of Questionable Actions by the Zuckerberg Five.
Chapter 5: Corporate Legal Defense to Facilitate Obstruction Might Violate the Wisconsin Ethics Code.
Chapter 6: Wisconsin Election Officials’ Widespread Use of Absentee Ballot Drop Boxes Facially Violated Wisconsin Law.
Chapter 7: The Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) Unlawfully Directed Clerks to Violate Rules Protecting Nursing Home Residents, Resulting in a 100% Voting Rate in Many Nursing Homes in 2020, Including Many Ineligible Voters.
Chapter 8: WEC Also Unlawfully Encouraged Evasion of Ballot Security Measures Related to “Indefinitely Confined” Voters at the Behest of Outside Corporations.
Chapter 9: Wards Under Guardianship Orders (and Legally Prohibited from Voting)
Voted Unimpeded by Wisconsin’s Election Officials as They Are Not Recorded in the WisVote Voter Database, Even Though the Circuit Courts Have This Information.
Chapter 10: Non-citizens Voted Unimpeded by Wisconsin’s Election Officials as They Are Not Recorded in the WisVote Voter Database, Even Though Wisconsin Law Requires Citizenship to Vote.
Chapter 11: Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha, and Green Bay Election Officials May Have Violated the Federal and Wisconsin Equal Protection Clauses by Not Treating All Voters Equal in the Same Election.
Ultimately I sincerely hope that you read the full report, but absolutely do read Emerald Robinson’s post linked above. One of the report items that she does quote is this content:
As of the date of this Report, the voting machine companies have refused to comply
with the OSC’s legislative subpoenas, and have provided no data. The OSC considers this investigation incomplete but ongoing.The OSC also sought information about the machines in Wisconsin used on election night from the clerks. The clerks either did not possess the data sought by the OSC or refused to provide it, with Green Bay and Madison insinuating that providing secure voting machine data to the OSC would somehow compromise election integrity. In other words, these cities claim that it is impossible to verify the integrity of the voting machines because doing that would jeopardize the integrity of both the machines and future elections.
Refusal to provide election related information and data to an agent of any state legislature should again be an immediate hauled off to jail arrest with felony charges lodged against anyone and everyone refusing to provide the information. It’s not like it’s some talk show host coming in and asking for information. This refusal to provide what is fully public information (other than specific personal information on voters, and even that information should be available to any official investigation) is a step beyond prima facie evidence of criminal behavior. You do not deliberately hide the information from the official governmental body constitutionally bound to run elections unless the information is incriminating to you or the people you are working for.
The last sentence that I put in bold is a tactic used by democrats in multiple states. In some cases it’s been used by sleazy RINOs as well. It is literally the equivalent of a bald faced lie. It is actually worse than Bill Clinton claiming that he did not have sex with Monica Lewinsky. There is a certain % of people that would agree with Clinton’s claim, but there is ABSOLUTELY ZERO truth to the democrats’ claims that no one can look at the voting machines and other election hardware without compromising them or even ruining them.
If you took your car to a mechanic anywhere, and he told you that he could not read the information stored on your car’s internal computer without then needing to replace that computer, that would be a complete and ridiculous lie. Another analogy for the democrats’ lies on this is that if you have a Microsoft Excel file on your computer, if an investigator looks at the contents of the file then you not only need to have a new install of Excel, you also need to replace your computer or Excel won’t work any more. It is literally that horribly bad of a lie.
As someone who is very computer savvy and has built at least a dozen computers, and as someone who has more than two decades of complex hardware related testing experience, I can confirm that this is absolutely the same as my Excel example, and in fact even worse. You’ll be happy to know that your cell phone, for example, gets fully tested after it comes out of production. (At least for any reputable phone maker.) And the equipment that does the testing has to meet calibration criteria, and that calibration is performed every year or every other year for most pieces of electronic test equipment.
All kinds of others products also get tested and inspected before they are deemed ready for sale. And if you had a problem and took your device to a service center after you bought it, of course they could perform various different tests without rendering your device useless.
Your car/truck/SUV though is the thing that you take more than anything else for service. If you ever tried to claim that the shop where you took your vehicle could not test drive the vehicle or you would need to buy a new one, you would be laughed out of the shop and told to go away and never come back.
That is exactly the scenario you need to think of anytime you hear a lying sleazeball democrat or RINO claim that election hardware cannot be inspected by auditors without rendering it useless. It is a complete stinking lie that tells you you’re dealing with criminals. It’s absolutely sickening that every single one of the slimeballs making this claim are not behind bars right now.
Make sure to read the appendix in the report on legal actions to get a better picture on just how hard the criminals are working to cover up their crimes. Nobody does this unless they have done something wrong that they need to hide.