You have to do the research, and that takes time.
Election fraud evidence is like the global warming scam in that respect. To be knowledgeable on either subject you need to take a good bit of time to educate yourself.
One of the main reasons I started this stack was to help educate people. Not just on election fraud, global warming, and the Corona scamdemic/plandemic, but also on a number of other issues. Hopefully I can reduce the time it takes for anyone reading this stack to get up to speed in any given area. By all means let me know how I’m doing in the comments section.
A good example of something time consuming is looking at the actual laws on the books already as well as proposed legislation. In 2020 there was widespread hiding of election activities in democrat stronghold cities, which was and still is prima facie evidence of democrat cheating/election fraud. And the more you look for democrat hiding of election activities past, present, and future, the more you will find.
At this point Maricopa County Arizona is a laughingstock of the entire world due to the long drawn out ballot counting process and all the huge issues at the polling places on election day. As was expected and as was confirmed even by the far left wing USA Today, voters on election day were going for Republicans by at least 70%, so of course voter suppression that day was massively in favor of democrats. You’re tempted to use the old “third world” comparison when looking at all the polling places where ballots were not scanning properly and thus were making people wait for hours and hours, but the vast majority of the third world runs elections better than Maricopa County!!!
On that note, it’s appropriate to look at an Arizona election bill that failed earlier this year. It was 4 simple paragraphs to codify that election observers could fully observe everything going on. If you don’t have anything to hide, of course you would support this bill fully:
Note that even in the language above, there would be room for dirty democrats to pull the same crap they did very heavily in Detroit, to name just one example. Paragraph 4 has the very vague language of “SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS” as an excuse to eject an observer. More detail would HAVE to be added such that Republican observers could not be removed arbitrarily by dirty democrats.
The language above was the original, and there were then changes made to water down some of the ability to observe and to introduce a time and expense element of training:
So in the later version, in paragraph 1, observers could not observe the transport of “equipment or supplies”. Of course dirty democrats, including left wing judges, could take “equipment or supplies” and run with it. Aren’t ballots “supplies”?? And when you know how so many ballots go through Runbeck Election Services you can see why democrats would want that language in there.
Paragraph 2 in the later version adds in more ways for dirty democrats to stop observers. Questions would have to be directed to supervisors and the “process must not be disrupted”. So if shenanigans are going on, even if an observer sees them, they can continue going on. If there are no supervisors nearby, they could continue going on for some time, and the observer now can’t actually keep observing because he or she has got to go chase down a “supervisor”.
Paragraph 5 adds in a training requirement, which if you think about it a minute, if the observers are properly trained why do they need a supervisor or “designated respondent” to stop illegal activity that they see??? Why wouldn’t they be able to tell any workers to stop because they’re doing something wrong??? This change in the language allows a HUGE hole that I guarantee you that dirty democrats would exploit. They would make sure to limit “supervisors” and/or “designated respondents” and to make them hard to reach quickly. The changes in paragraph 2 alone would allow democrats to continue cheating.
But even with those changes to restrict the ability to observe, EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT IN THE AZ SENATE VOTED AGAINST THIS BILL!!! Democrats did not want even the watered down version to be put into state law, BECAUSE THEY DO NOT WANT PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO OBSERVE WHAT IS GOING ON, AND THAT’S BECAUSE THEY WANT TO BE ABLE TO CONTINUE CHEATING!!!
There is really no other inference to make. If you’re doing everything on the up and up, you have no problem with fully empowered observers and you have no problems whatsoever even with the original and much stronger version of the bill. None of what is being observed in an election involves personal data or involves national secrets in any way, so the only reason to limit observation is if you want to cheat!!! So yes, of course, anyone voting against such a bill is in on the cheating or has been paid off by someone doing the cheating.
Change my mind.
P.S. Please note that there were multiple other election security bills that failed early this year.